Hence, the filling coefficient is relatively high. When the speed of the grinding wheel is low, the gas barrier layer is weak. Thus, the filling coefficient becomes large. When the grinding fluid jet velocity is increased, the capability to overcome the gas barrier layer is strengthened. A large filling coefficient results in a high useful flow rate. Meanwhile, the filling coefficient is 0.5 in the simulation settings. The effect of the gas barrier layer causes the grinding fluid to penetrate the surface pore, which has different coefficients. This difference is mainly due to the different peripheral velocities of the grinding wheel and grinding fluid jet velocities. Results show that experimental and simulation results differ slightly under certain grinding parameters. Moreover, the influence of the speed of the grinding wheel, grinding fluid jet velocity, particle size, and bulk porosity on useful flow and useful flow rate was analyzed. A collection device for the useful flow of grinding fluid was designed. In this paper, the useful flow and flow rate of grinding fluid under casting surface grinding condition were extensively studied through experimentation. However, the experiment has not been further verified. A detailed assessment of the improvement in the useful flow rate of grinding fluid, which optimizes the grinding fluid supply, has been published in the International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (Modeling and simulation of useful fluid flow rate in grinding 2014, 75 (9-12):1587-1604). The mathematical model of the useful flow and flow rate of grinding fluid under casting surface grinding condition has been established.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |